首页> 外文OA文献 >Individual patient data analysis of progression-free survival versus overall survival as a first-line end point for metastatic colorectal cancer in modern randomized trials: Findings from the analysis and research in cancers of the digestive system database
【2h】

Individual patient data analysis of progression-free survival versus overall survival as a first-line end point for metastatic colorectal cancer in modern randomized trials: Findings from the analysis and research in cancers of the digestive system database

机译:在现代随机试验中,将无进展生存期与总体生存期作为转移性结直肠癌的第一线终点的个体患者数据分析:消化系统数据库癌症的分析和研究结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE: \ud\udProgression-free survival (PFS) has previously been established as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Because mCRC treatment has advanced in the last decade with extended OS, this surrogacy requires re-examination.\ud\udMETHODS: \ud\udIndividual patient data from 16,762 patients were available from 22 first-line mCRC studies conducted from 1997 to 2006; 12 of those studies tested antiangiogenic and/or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. The relationship between PFS (first event of progression or death) and OS was evaluated by using R(2) statistics (the closer the value is to 1, the stronger the correlation) from weighted least squares regression of trial-specific hazard ratios estimated by using Cox and Copula models.\ud\udRESULTS: \ud\udForty-four percent of patients received a regimen that included biologic agents. Median first-line PFS was 8.3 months, and median OS was 18.2 months. The correlation between PFS and OS was modest (R(2), 0.45 to 0.69). Analyses limited to trials that tested treatments with biologic agents, nonstrategy trials, or superiority trials did not improve surrogacy.\ud\udCONCLUSION: \ud\udIn modern mCRC trials, in which survival after the first progression exceeds time to first progression, a positive but modest correlation was observed between OS and PFS at both the patient and trial levels. This finding demonstrates the substantial variability in OS introduced by the number of lines of therapy and types of effective subsequent treatments and the associated challenge to the use of OS as an end point to assess the benefit attributable to a single line of therapy. PFS remains an appropriate primary end point for first-line mCRC trials to detect the direct treatment effect of new agents.
机译:目的:\ ud \ ud无进展生存期(PFS)已被确立为一线转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)总体生存期(OS)的替代品。由于近十年来随着mCRC治疗的发展,OS延长,因此这种代孕需要重新检查。这些研究中的12个测试了抗血管生成和/或抗表皮生长因子受体药物。 PFS(进展或死亡的首发事件)与OS之间的关系是通过R(2)统计量(值越接近1,相关性越强)对RFS进行评估的,该加权均方根是通过估算特定于试验的危险比的加权最小二乘回归得出的使用Cox和Copula模型。\ ud \ ud结果:\ ud \ ud44%的患者接受了包括生物制剂的治疗方案。一线PFS中位数为8.3个月,OS中位数为18.2个月。 PFS和OS之间的相关性中等(R(2),0.45至0.69)。分析仅限于使用生物制剂治疗的试验,非策略试验或优势试验不能改善代孕。结论:\ ud \ ud在现代mCRC试验中,首次进展后的生存时间超过第一次进展的时间,阳性但在患者和试验水平上,OS和PFS之间均存在适度的相关性。这一发现表明,由治疗路线的数量和有效的后续治疗类型引起的OS的实质性差异,以及使用OS作为评估单一治疗方案的获益终点的相关挑战。对于一线mCRC试验,PFS仍然是合适的主要终点,以检测新药的直接治疗效果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号